This only works as a conversation with consequences

AICB is a design in public. It needs lawyers, engineers, local government people, landholders, and residents who have lived through a planning inquiry and still want the next town to be better.

Covenant Article 9.6: an objection is incompetent unless it includes a specific, feasible alternative that still meets the published envelope. Pure negation is struck out. The form below is that rule applied to the documents themselves.

Useful work

  • Stress-test the Act. Mark clauses that would fail Commons scrutiny or judicial construction, and send the replacement clause.
  • Improve the Pattern Book brief. Typologies that are buildable, insurable, and vernacular — not another pattern-language poster.
  • Endow the social commons. How large a reserved housing stock, on what tenancy rules, funded from which slice of uplift.
  • Name a footprint honestly. The working first specification is Tempsford interchange. Attack the hectares, the precept split, or the year-one streets — with a map that still clears the statutory floor.

Forced Construction package

Three fields are required: what is wrong, the replacement, and why the replacement still meets the envelope. Anything less is a shrug, and a shrug is not a notice.

0/20 characters minimum

0/20 characters minimum

0/20 characters minimum

The button opens your mail client to networkcommonsgov@gmail.com with the three fields filled. If no mail client is installed, copy the package and paste it. A package missing an alternative is struck out, as Covenant 9.6 requires of an objection.

Fill the three required fields (at least 20 characters each) before the mail link will open.

Not a party, not a membership scheme, not a request for your data beyond what you choose to put in an email. The NCG constitutional writing lives at networkedcommonsgovernance.org.